
For reasonably modern ones, you will need to use several different Stencils, and Insert a reasonable number of graphics or images. OG is by far the easiest tool to use for "swimlane" diagrams.
Omnigraffle swimlanes free#
Those who are stuck to Visio are free to use my PDFs as a base, and add content.Reviewing all the comments carefully. But I do not export interim or incremental docs (described above) in Visio because the back-and-forth is very messy. I do export final diagrams to Visio, if the customer really wants it.
Omnigraffle swimlanes pdf#
Several just print the PDF and mark it up with a pen He refers to my § headings (Legal numbering, pre-planned, absolutely necessary) One mathematician, who hates diagrams and loves text, sends me a text file with cryptic notes. I receive docs made in Visio, that have my PDF imported, and then whatever the author wishes to comment request-for-change question etc, on top of that. I never moved onto it, so there is nothing to reverse.Įven in a “shared doc” context, if you do not have the rule that one designated person owns the doc, you will have grief, that is avoidable.Īnyone and everyone can comment on my docs. The cloud concept is broken, major corps are moving away from it, back to domestic servers. The document did not create itself, focussing on the doc is an error.įocus on the author, who created the doc. I did not allow it in the old days (shared doc on an internal file server) and I definitely do not allow it nowadays (Google Docs “internal” cloud file server etc). The whole notion of a shared document sucks dead bears. As a matter of (a) a visible delivery, as well as (b) a matter of pride, I don’t want anyone writing on them. in the middle of a project, containing far less content than the final), which are subject to ongoing changes, are mine mine mine. I have the dubious luxury that I am a consultant, not really part of a team, even though I may head a customer team for the duration of a project. there would be issues re lines joined to objects shadows etc.

And I do not see how it can be done within the current limits of OG and PP. The question still remains is there in any way you could take a OG flowchart and move it into PP so you can manipulate the flowchart at it’s individual elements? I am not suggesting that it is a great presentation tool, or that it is equivalent to PP/Keynote. If the presentation needs to be given in increments, or you need to “move separate objects around”, use OG. I am saying, use the right tool for the job. You may be stuck in Maslow’s Law of the Instrument. I think we are losing sight of the question and talking theory/usability (The typewriter is definitely better for some tasks, and the computer definitely better for other tasks.) I don’t understand what you mean in your computer::typewriter analogy. It’s like saying why use a computer (OG) when you have a typewriter (PP for flowchart)? Yes, this means that your OG doc is set up as a Template, it contains everything that you would put in the PP doc.For highlighting text or an object, I use a cursor, which is a rectangle with a 4pt blue Stroke, and a white 0% Fill.Move elements around, as you explain things.Present increments simply by starting with all Layers turned off, and by turning Layers On for each increment.Pretty much the same as, but don’t create the incremental PDFs, only the final PDF.Example: here are the first 5 increments of 18 increments, as single PDFs, all created from a single diagram on a single Canvas.For the final intense single-page lecture note, turn On all layers, and export as PDF.
Omnigraffle swimlanes series#
